F1 abu dhabi 2010 download free7/28/2023 ![]() That Article 15.3 gives the Race Director “overriding authority” over “the use of the safety car”.ĥ. That therefore Article 48.13 “overrides” Article 48.12.Ĥ. The Article 48.13 of the Sporting Regulations states that the message “Safety Car in this lap” is the signal that it will enter the pit lane at the end of that lap.ģ. They therefore requested the Stewards to amend the Classification under Article 11.9.3.h of the FIA International Sporting Code.Ģ. Mercedes argued that had this been complied with, Car 44 would have won the race. Mercedes claimed that there were two breaches of the Sporting Regulations (Article 48.12) namely that which states “.any cars that have been lapped by the leader will be required to pass the cars on the lead lap and the safety car” and “…once the last lapped car has passed the leader the safety car will return to the pits at the end of the following lap.” Red Bull submitted graphical information (Exhibit A). At the hearing the parties referred to the documents submitted. The parties set out oral arguments and addressed the questions asked by the Stewards.ģ. At the hearing there were no objections against the composition of the Stewards panel. The Race Director was present for the reconvened hearing.Ģ. The hearing adjourned at 2050hrs to allow Red Bull to consider its response in further detail and reconvened at 2130hrs. Red Bull, as an “interested party” was permitted to attend. The following persons were present during the hearing: On December 12 the parties were summoned at 2015 hrs (Documents 54 and 55) and heard. Protest filed by Mercedes-AMG Petronas F1 Team against the Classification established at the end of the Competition Stewards Decision:ġ.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |